# GLD Short Put 7 DTE s2 signal Options Backtest

In this post we’ll take a look at the backtest results of opening one GLD short put 7 DTE position each trading day from Jul 1 2010 through Nov 30 2021 and see if there are any discernible trends.

Backtest duration is limited to due to the release date of weekly options on GLD.

We will also explore the performance of the s2 signal. The s2 signal is a boolean (TRUE / FALSE) daily indicator that attempts to identify the days in which short put and short vertical put positions on the SPDR Gold ETF are most likely to be profitable at expiration. s2 is based on data from CBOE and S&P Global.

The thesis is that if we limit order entry to only the days in which s2 is TRUE, we will be “swinging at only the best pitches.” On the days when s2 is FALSE, take no action. Existing positions will remain untouched and no new positions will be opened.

To test this thesis we will:

- limit order entry to only the days in which s2 = TRUE to see if the strategy outperforms daily entry in a statistically significant way
- limit order entry to only the days in which s2 = FALSE to see if the strategy underperforms daily entry in a statistically significant way

Performance of the s2 signal is explored in different contexts in other, non-paywalled s2 signal studies.

All this talk about signals is fine and dandy but a signal-based strategy in isolation isn’t helpful. Let’s compare it against the following benchmark and see how it performs:

- GLD buy/hold (total return) | 100% allocation, no leverage

There are 15 backtests in this study evaluating over 13,900 GLD short put 7 DTE leveraged trades.

Let’s dive in!

Contents

## Summary

The s2 signal yielded a 175% improvement in capital efficiency over “market-agnostic” 7 DTE daily short put strats. The s2 signal was able to:

- realize up to 167% of the total return (yes, more than 100%) of a daily-entry strat
- with 50% fewer trades
- capturing up to 3.1x more premium per trade
- boosting sharpe ratio by up to 2.4x

The s2 signals’s 16D, 30D and 50D short put 7 DTE strats outperformed buy/hold GLD with regard to:

- total return
- risk-adjusted return
- annualized volatility
- max drawdown
- max drawdown duration

The s2 signal outperformed a comparable “market agnostic” daily short put strategy with regard to:

- total return (3 out of 5 strats)
- risk-adjusted return (all strats)
- annualized volatility (all strats)
- max drawdown (all strats)
- max drawdown duration (3 out of 5 strats)
- win rate (all strats)
- premium capture (all strats)
- profit spent on commission (all strats)

Daily s2 signal email alert is available as a 7-day free trial and can be enabled / disabled in the subscriber dashboard.

## Methodology

### Strategy Details

- Symbol: GLD
- Strategy: Short Put
- Days Till Expiration: 7 DTE +/- 4, closest to 7
- Start Date: 2010-07-01
- End Date: 2021-11-30
- Positions opened per trade: 1
- Entry Days: each trading day in which s2 signal = TRUE
- Entry Signal: s2 signal
- Timing 3:46pm ET
- Strike Selection
- 5 delta +/- 4.5, closest to 5
- 10 delta +/- 5, closest to 10
- 16 delta +/- 6, closest to 16
- 30 delta +/- 8, closest to 30
- 50 delta +/- 8, closest to 50

- Trade Entry
- 5D short put
- 10D short put
- 16D short put
- 30D short put
- 50D short put

- Trade Exit
- Hold till expiration

- Max Margin Utilization Target (short option strats only): 100% | 5x leverage
- Max Drawdown Target: 99% | account value shall not go negative

### Assumptions

- Margin requirement for short CALL and PUT positions is 20% of notional
- Margin requirement for short STRADDLE and STRANGLE positions is 20% of the larger strike
- Margin requirement for short VERTICAL SPREAD positions is the difference between the strikes
- Margin requirement for short CALENDAR SPREAD positions is 20% of the short option (short option expires after the long option)
- Margin requirement for long CALENDAR SPREAD positions is the net cost of the spread (short option expires before the long option)
- Early assignment never occurs
- There is ample liquidity at all times
- Margin calls never occur (starting capital is arbitrarily set so that max margin utilization never exceeds 100%)
- Apply a 20% discount on displayed results. For example, if a strat depicts a CAGR of 10%, assume that it’ll yield 8% in practice. This is to account for hindsight bias being used when determining starting capital in the backtest.

### Mechanics

- Prices are in USD
- Prices are nominal (not adjusted for inflation)
- All statistics are pre-tax, where applicable
- Margin collateral is invested in 3mo US treasuries and earns interest daily
- Assignment P/L is calculated by closing the ITM position at 3:46pm ET the day of position exit if managed early or 4:00pm if held till expiration
- Commission to open, close early, or expire ITM is 1.00 USD per non-index underlying (eg: SPY, AAPL, etc.) contract
- Commission to open, close early, or expire ITM is 1.32 USD per index underlying (eg: SPX, RUT) contract
- Commission to expire worthless is 0.00 USD per contract (non-index and index)
- Commission to open or close non-option positions, if applicable, is 0.00 USD
- Slippage is calculated according to the slippage table
- Starting capital for short option backtests is adjusted in $1000 increments such that max margin utilization is between 80-100%, closest to 100%, of max margin utilization target
- Starting capital for long option backtests is adjusted in $1000 increments such that max drawdown is between 80-100%, closest to 100%, of max drawdown target
- Positions that have an exit date beyond the backtest end date are excluded
- For comprehensive details, visit the methodology page

## Results

### Starting Capital

Starting capital requirements of the s2 = TRUE strategies were within $1,100 of the daily-entry strategies and lower than the s2 = FALSE strats.

### Margin Utilization

s2 = TRUE signal yielded a lower average margin utilization vs daily entry.

Hindsight bias was used to maximize Reg-T margin utilization for each strategy. This allows a “best case” scenario for the option strategy to outperform the benchmark.

Also displayed is the date in which each strategy experienced maximum margin utilization.

### Premium Capture

s2 = TRUE signal had higher rates of premium capture vs daily entry.

The higher the delta the lower the premium capture.

### Win Rate

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to win rate.

The higher the delta the lower the win rate.

### Monthly Returns

s2 = TRUE signal underperformed daily entry with regard to average monthly return. 16D and 30D were exceptions.

The higher the delta the greater the average monthly return for s2 = True strats.

Also displayed is the best and worst monthly returns for each strategy.

### Max Drawdown

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to max drawdown.

The higher the delta the greater the max drawdown.

### Max Drawdown Duration

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to max drawdown duration. The 5D and 10D strats’ max drawdown date per above was just a few months prior to the conclusion of the backtest and have not yet had ample time to recover.

The higher the delta the greater the max drawdown duration.

### Average Trade Duration

The average trade duration for all strategies was 7 days. The 50D s2 = True strat ended up with a slightly longer average duration.

### Compound Annual Growth Rate

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to compound annual growth rate. 5D and 10D were exceptions.

The higher the delta the greater the CAGR for the s2 = True and daily-entry strats.

### Annual Volatility

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to annual volatility.

The higher the delta the greater the annual volatility.

### Sharpe Ratio

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to sharpe ratio.

Risk-adjusted returns were mixed across delta targets.

The 5D s2 = TRUE signal strategy had the greatest risk-adjusted return among the option strategies.

### Profit Spent on Commission

19.99% – the average percent of profits spent on commission across profitable option strategies. This excludes the 16D s2 = False strat, which was profitable before commissions but unprofitable after.

### Total P/L

s2 = TRUE signal outperformed daily entry with regard to total P/L. 5D and 10D were exceptions.

Total return performance was mixed across delta targets.

### Overall

All s2 = True and daily-entry option strategies were eventually profitable. s2 = False 16D, 30D and 50D strats were unprofitable.

## Discussion

The results of opening positions only on the days in which the s2 signal = TRUE is compelling. Let’s take a look under the hood and see what’s happening in a bit more detail. In the comparison we’ll look at buy/hold GLD, opening a 30D short put daily, opening a 30D short put only on days when s2 = TRUE, and opening a 30D short put only on days when s2 = FALSE.

### Starting Capital and Leverage

Trading exclusively when the s2 signal = FALSE requires significantly more starting capital in order to successfully execute the strategy.

### Win Rate Stats

The s2 signal = TRUE strat has roughly half ( 1405 / 2801 ) of the number of occurrences vs daily entry.

### Profit and Loss Stats

To calculate capital efficiency of the s2 signal, let’s strip out the impacts of interest on margin collateral and commissions and look at strictly the P/L of the options themselves. The formula is:

( ( strat return / benchmark return ) / ( strat occurrences / benchmark occurrences ) -1 ) * 100

In this example we get:

- strat return = ( 16,382 / 21,600 ) = 0.76
- benchmark return = ( 11,275 / 20,500 ) = 0.55

When we plug in the numbers to the overall formula we get:

- ( ( 0.76 / 0.55 ) / ( 1405 / 2801 ) -1 ) * 100 = 175.47
- s2 signal yields a 175% increase, or 2.7x improvement in capital efficiency vs daily entry for the 30D strat

Across all the strats we have:

### Performance Stats

Risk adjusted return when s2 = TRUE is 2.4x greater than daily entry.

### Risk Management

Max drawdown when s2 = TRUE is a fraction of the daily entry or s2 = False strats. Max drawdown duration is also materially shortened.

Limiting order entry to days in which the s2 signal = TRUE yields comparable or greater total return vs a daily-entry strategy while materially lowering max drawdown, max drawdown duration, annualized volatility, commission drag and consequently boosting premium capture and risk-adjusted return.

Think about it for a moment. An investor trades roughly half as often and generates nearly the same total return. There’s no need to swing at every pitch; open a position only when it’s worthwhile.

### Distribution of s2 signals

The s2 = TRUE signal, while suggesting order entry on roughly half the trading days since 2009, is not evenly distributed throughout time. Here’s a breakdown of participation rate by year:

Daily s2 signal email alert is available as a 7-day free trial and can be enabled / disabled in the subscriber dashboard.

## Additional Resources

### Private, Custom Backtests

Discover your edge with private, custom backtests for as little as 99 USD. Learn more or contact us for a quote.

### Trade Logs

Visit the trade log store to download the data used in this and other backtests.

### s1 signal

Trade S&P 500 options more efficiently using the s1 signal. Learn more.

### s2 signal

Trade GLD options more efficiently using the s2 signal. Learn more.

### s4 signal

Trade Russell 2000 options more efficiently using the s4 signal. Learn more.

### mREIT Dashboard

High-yield, low-beta alternatives to cash or treasury holdings. Learn more.

### Consultations

Have your specific scenario reviewed and get direct answers to your questions. Strategy reviews, portfolio optimizations, tax arbitrage, early retirement, and more. Schedule a consultation *today*.

Ohad Osterreicher

January 14, 2022 @ 5:58 am

Hey, great content as always (:

Have you thought of using the same strategy but with gold future options?

I mean, GLD options have a relatively small notional value. So if someone wanted to implement this strategy on a larger account, he could achieve a higher capital efficiency by writing gold FOP (e.g., fewer commissions, spreads, etc. drag). What do you think?

spintwig.com

January 14, 2022 @ 9:32 am

Thank you!

Yes. Performance should be identical-to-slightly better due to commission efficiency of FOPs. I chose GLD as the underlying as it is more accessible (eg: smaller accounts can trade it) but it can indeed be supported by notionally-larger instruments.

Ohad Osterreicher

April 5, 2022 @ 3:25 pm

So after a 3 months of running this strategy profitably (: I’m confident in saying that GC=F is the way to go.

Pros:

Cons:

spintwig.com

April 7, 2022 @ 11:30 am

This is excellent feedback, thank you!