SPY Short Call 0 DTE Options Backtest

In this post we’ll take a look at the backtest results of opening one SPY short call 0 DTE position each trading day from Feb 1 2018 through Jul 15 2020 and see if there are any discernible trends. We’ll also explore the profitable strategies to see if any outperform buy-and-hold SPY.
Backtest duration is limited to due to the release date of Monday-expiring weekly options on SPY (see SEC release 34-82733). Timing luck can’t be empirically factored out prior to Feb 2018.
There are 10 backtests in this study evaluating over 5,900 SPY short call 0 DTE trades.
Let’s dive in!
Contents
Summary
Systematically opening SPY short call 0 DTE positions was profitable across all strategies except 30D.
None of the option strategies outperformed SPY with regard to total return.
Methodology
Strategy Details
- Symbol: SPY
- Strategy: Short Call
- Days Till Expiration: 0 DTE +/- 3, closest to 0
- Start Date: 2018-02-01
- End Date: 2020-07-15
- Positions opened per day: 1
- Entry Days: daily
- Entry Signal: N/A
- Timing: 3:46pm ET
- Strike Selection
- 5 delta +/- 4.5 delta, closest to 5
- 10 delta +/- 5 delta, closest to 10
- 16 delta +/- 6 delta, closest to 16
- 30 delta +/- 8 delta, closest to 30
- 50 delta +/- 8 delta, closest to 50
- Trade Entry
- 5D short call
- 10D short call
- 16D short call
- 30D short call
- 50D short call
- Trade Exit
- 50% max profit or expiration, whichever occurs first
- Hold till expiration
- Max Margin Utilization Target (short option strats only): 100% | 5x leverage
- Max Drawdown Target: 99% | account value shall not go negative
Assumptions
- Margin requirement for short CALL and PUT positions is 20% of notional
- Margin requirement for short STRADDLE and STRANGLE positions is 20% of the larger strike
- Margin requirement for short VERTICAL SPREAD positions is the difference between the strikes
- Margin requirement for short CALENDAR SPREAD positions, where the short option expires after the long option, is 20% of the short option
- Margin requirement for long CALENDAR SPREAD positions, where the short option expires before the long option, is the net cost of the spread
- Margin requirement for short IRON CONDOR positions is the difference between the call-side strikes if both sides are the same width, otherwise margin requirement is the width of the wider side
- Early assignment never occurs
- There is ample liquidity at all times
- Margin calls never occur (starting capital is set using hindsight bias so that max margin utilization never exceeds 100%)
- Apply a 20% discount to displayed results. For example, if a strat depicts a CAGR of 10%, assume that it’ll yield 8% in practice.
Mechanics
- Prices are in USD
- Prices are nominal (not adjusted for inflation)
- All statistics are pre-tax, where applicable
- Margin collateral is invested in 3mo US treasuries and earns interest daily
- Option positions are opened at 3:46pm ET
- Option positions are closed at 3:46pm ET (4:00pm if closed on the date of expiration)
- Commission to open, close early, or expire ITM is 1.00 USD per non-index underlying (eg: SPY, IWM, AAPL, etc.) contract
- Commission to open, close early, or expire ITM is 1.32 USD per index underlying (eg: SPX, RUT, etc.) contract
- Commission to expire worthless is 0.00 USD per contract (non-index and index)
- Commission to open or close non-option positions, if applicable, is 0.00 USD
- Slippage is calculated according to the slippage table
- Starting capital for short option backtests is adjusted in $1000 increments such that max margin utilization is between 80-100%, closest to 100%, of max margin utilization target
- Starting capital for long option backtests is adjusted in $1000 increments such that max drawdown is between 80-100%, closest to 100%, of max drawdown target
- Positions that have an exit date beyond the backtest end date are excluded
- For comprehensive details, visit the methodology page
Results
Overall

Starting Capital


Margin Utilization



Hindsight bias was used to maximize Reg-T margin utilization for each strategy. This allows a “best case” scenario for the option strategy to outperform the benchmark.
Win Rate


Premium Capture
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Monthly Returns
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Max Drawdown
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Max Drawdown Duration
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Average Trade Duration
Compound Annual Growth Rate
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Annual Volatility
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Sharpe Ratio
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Profit Spent on Commission
Total P/L
An active research insights subscription is needed to view this content. Already a subscriber? Log in. Not a subscriber? Sign up for just 99 USD a year. Learn more.
Discussion
My hypothesis walking into this study was that performance would be similar to the 45-DTE version – slightly profitable to unprofitable in virtually all scenarios.
It turns out my hypothesis was wrong. All strategies, except 30-delta, were profitable.
This is likely due to the distribution of IV overstatement across deltas being more uniform at 0-DTE vs 45-DTE. It appears some underpricing of 30D positions is occurring. Said another way: the spread between implied vol (IV) and realized vol (RV) on the 30D positions is narrower than that of the other delta targets.
Additional Resources
Trade Log Bundles
Visit the trade log store and download the data used in this and other backtests.
Private, Custom Backtests
Discover your edge with private, custom backtests for as little as 99 USD. Learn more or contact us for a quote.
Quality, Custom Trade Logs
With support for over 5,000 symbols, build institutional-quality custom trade logs for as little as 9.99 USD. Learn more.
s1 signal (S&P 500 and VIX)
Quantitative S&P 500 and VIX options trading with the s1 signal. Learn more.
s2 signal (Gold)
Quantitative Gold options trading with the s2 signal. Learn more.
s4 signal (Russell 2000)
Quantitative Russell 2000 options trading with the s4 signal. Learn more.
mREIT Preferred Share Dashboard
High-yield, low-beta alternatives to cash or treasury bills. Learn more.
Consultations
Schedule a consultation to review your specific scenario and get direct answers to your money questions.
Spintwig Groupie
January 12, 2022 @ 4:01 pm
Spintwig, I appreciate all the work you’ve put into these backtests and making your research public – you are to be commended.
With this particular backtest, would you anticipate these same results with SPX options as opposed to SPY? I can’t think of a way they would statistically different, but my brain IS kinda small….
spintwig.com
January 13, 2022 @ 10:32 am
You’re welcome! Happy to hear the data is helpful.
Yes, the results between SPX and SPY are expected to be substantially similar. SPX is more commission efficient while SPY has narrower spreads. These two effects essentially cancel each other out.
M
January 20, 2022 @ 12:34 am
I feel bad for clogging up your comments section w all my comments, but I got another question. This seems like a very good companion strategy to pair with your 0 DTE SPX short puts. Is there a reason why you don’t mention making this a part of your strategy?
spintwig.com
January 21, 2022 @ 12:39 am
Don’t feel bad! You’re not clogging anything up 🙂
There’s not enough data, IMHO, to draw a conclusion about 0-3 DTE short-call performance.
That being said, I’m working on an SPX short call 7 DTE study that has a backtest start date of Jan 2007. This will paint a better picture of historical performance characteristics of a short-dated options strat than the 2.5 years of data in this study. I anticipate having it published by the last Friday of this month.