TLT Short Put 45 DTE Cash-Secured Options Backtest

In this post we’ll take a look at the backtest results of opening one TLT short put each trading day from Jan 3 2007 through August 6 2019 and see if there are any discernible trends. We’ll also explore the profitable strategies to see if any outperform buy-and-hold TLT.
There are 10 backtests in this study evaluating over 30,700 TLT short put trades.
Let’s dive in!
Contents
Methodology
Core Strategy
- Symbol TLT
- Strategy Short Put
- Start Date 2007-01-03
- End Date 2019-08-06
- Positions opened 1
- Entry Days every trading day
- Timing 3:46pm ET
- Strike Selection
- 5 delta +/- 4.5 delta, closest to 5
- 10 delta +/- 5 delta, closest to 10
- 16 delta +/- 6 delta, closest to 16
- 30 delta +/- 8 delta, closest to 30
- 50 delta +/- 8 delta, closest to 50
- Trade Entry
- 5D short put
- 10D short put
- 16D short put
- 30D short put
- 50D short put
- Trade Exit
- 50% max profit or 21 DTE, whichever occurs first
- Hold till expiration
Assumptions
- Margin requirements are always satisfied
- Margin calls never occur
- Margin requirement for short CALL and PUT positions is 20% of notional
- Margin requirement for short STRADDLE and STRANGLE positions is 20% of the larger strike
- Margin requirement for short VERTICAL SPREAD positions is the difference between the strikes
- Early assignment never occurs
Mechanics
- Prices are in USD
- Prices are nominal (not adjusted for inflation)
- Margin collateral is held as cash and earns no interest
- Assignment P/L is calculated by closing the ITM position at 3:46pm ET the day of expiration / position exit
- Commission to open, close early, or expire ITM is 1.00 USD per contract
- Commission to expire worthless is 0.00 USD per contract
- Commission to open or close non-option positions, if applicable, is 0.00 USD
- Slippage is calculated according to the slippage table
- For comprehensive details, visit the methodology page
Scope
This study seeks to measure the performance of opening short put positions and will interpret the results from the lens of income generation relative to buy-and-hold TLT.
The utility of the short put strategy as a portfolio hedging tool or other use will not be discussed and is out of scope.
Results
Win Rate


Managing trades early lowered the win rate.
The riskier the trade the lower the win rate.
Annual Volatility
An active membership is needed to view this content. Already a member? Log in.
Worst Monthly Return
An active membership is needed to view this content. Already a member? Log in.
Average P/L Per Day
An active membership is needed to view this content. Already a member? Log in.
Average Trade Duration


The 5D strategies experienced about 10% fewer occurrences relative to the 16D, 30D and 50D strategies due to no positions existing in the 0.5 – 9.5 delta range during volatile times. Similarly, the 10D strategies saw 3% fewer occurrences.
These artifacts are what cause the 5D 50% strategy to increase in average trade duration and the 5D and 10D hold-till-expiration strategies to have lower average durations.
Compound Annual Growth Rate
An active membership is needed to view this content. Already a member? Log in.
Sharpe Ratio
An active membership is needed to view this content. Already a member? Log in.
Profit Spent on Commission


Here we see the magnitude of commission drag on the respective strategies.
23.83% – the blended average percent of profits spent on commission across all short put strategies.
Total P/L


Holding till expiration yielded improved total P/L across the board.
Overall

Every option strategy was both profitable and underperformed the buy-and-hold strategy.
Discussion
The primary driver of TLT’s performance is the 30-year US treasury rate. Let’s overlay data from FRED onto the overall performance chart.

As we can see, there is a strong inverse relationship between TLT and the 30-year interest rate. As 30Y rates go down, TLT goes up. As 30Y rates go up, TLT goes down.
The federal funds rate has less influence at the 20+ year mark on the maturity curve than, say, at the 3-year mark.
I’ll leave the “influencing factors of the 20+ year curve” discussion for the comment section.
Summary
Systematically selling short puts on TLT is profitable.
All TLT short put strategies underperformed buy-and-hold TLT.
The 5D @ hold-till-expiration TLT short put strategy had the greatest risk-adjusted return.
Thanks for reading 🙂
Additional Resources
Custom Backtests
Have your ideas professionally backtested.
- trades ideas remain confidential
- backtest results remain unpublished
- deliverables include:
- a master-results spreadsheet
- raw trade logs and data sources
- most custom research is completed within 5 business days
Contact me for a quote.
Trade Logs
Visit the trade log store to download the trade logs associated with this and other published studies.
Thoughts? Feedback? Dedications? Shoutouts? Leave a message in the comments below!